A Flash Site is a Bimbo Site
If a web site uses Macromedia Flash that site is probably rubbish. Think:
Thus, if a site uses flash, it is either empty or flaky, and should be avoided. If a business site uses flash, find a competitor.
Macromedia must have known this when they named the product “flash”, as in “flashy”, as in more money than sense. Flash means smart to look at but nothing up top, it’s bimbo without gender. A flash site is a bimbo site.
Some people argue they use flash to make a site look good. It doesn’t, it makes the site look animated, like a junky on a downer looks animated. The web is naturally a still medium, and works best with the still arts; why else is it that the great majority of websites, including mega–rich company websites, don’t have animation? It’s because animation is wrong. Using movement is forcing something onto a web page that doesn’t belong there. If the web was naturally animated, then why are animated adverts so annoying, why do the best animated pages have very little movement? Animation is attention–seeking, it’s no confidence and demand reassurance, it’s something to be dealt with by a child–psychologist, it’s the pub bore.
The fact is that movement and animation can never fit comfortably on a web page. Animation in general, and flash in particular, can only detract. Artistically, flash has nothing to offer.
There are, of course, specific technical places where flash could be used as a tool to illustrate or report something. I can imagine a flash animation showing exactly how Ebola is caught and how it kills its victims, how stupid driving (such as pulling out in front of a lorry carrying a tank) causes a lethal motorway pile–up, how a gunshot to the head splatters brains, you know, the kind of highly destructive thing that needs to be understood so it can be avoided. Rather like Flash, really.
The reason why I specifically don’t like Flash, incidentally, compared to its competitors, is because it keeps attempting to infect my computer. All I need to is accidentally visit a flash–ridden site, and I get asked, yet again, do I want my system damaged with the flash control? I keep answering no, and the next day some other blasted stupid site asks me the same damn question. I know full well if I say yes to so much as once, I'll never be asked if I want to repent, if I want my system cured, if I want rid of flash. If being absolved of flash on my system was as easy as being infected, I’d be a lot less irritated by it.
No doubt the technical half–wits amongst you will be thinking: “But it’s Windows that puts up that irritating question, it’s Windows that doesn’t bother to remember your answer and keeps asking the same question pointlessly again and again and again …”, and you’ll be absolutely right, but as the full–wits realise, it would be so easy for Macromedia to add a message box to Flash, to ask, say, once a day, “You computer has been infected with Flash, do you want it cured?” The fact that they don’t shows flash is a computer equivalent of tobacco; it’s so easy and simple to get addicted—all it takes is one foolish yes. It’s extremely difficult to get cured.
Pah! A flash site is a bimbo site. Use flash if you want your site relegated to the league of idiots.
All Boots Are Size 11, Sir
Reusing Old Computers
Why I Don’t Like Apple
A Flash Site is a Bimbo Site
is hosted by
arts & ego
© 1978–2019 dylan harris