Nationalism and Racism
The Daily Mail is no longer anti-semitic. However, it was racist for those very significant years in the 1930s. It "published articles lamenting the number of German Jews entering Britain as refugees after the rise of Nazism." (here). Those who seem to be ex-racist either learn the mistake and completely change their attitude, or they don't change their attitude, they merely learn to keep their mouth shut. A lot of racists feel an affinity with nationalism. Rather than hating one particular group of different people, nationalists often exhibit a more unfocus dislike of all foreigners. A racist who has leart to keep his mouth shut will likely become a vocal nationalist. This does not mean all nationalists are racists, far from it. But it does mean that racists infiltrate nationalism. An example of a racist party pretending to be nationalist is Vlaams Belang, here in Flanders. It is the direct inheritor of Vlaams Blok, shut down by the courts for breaking Belgium's anti-racism laws. Vlaams Belang has policies, amongst other things, to forgive nazi war criminals. They are both anti-semitic and anti-Muslim. An example of a nationalist party that is not racist is the UKIP. They are strongly nationalist, I disagree with them, but I do not have any reason to believe they're racist. Indeed, they have expelled one of their MEPs who has since proven himself a racist. I disagree with nationalism, I detest racism. I am suspicious of nationalists, because active racists hide amongst them. Now we come on to the issue of immigration. If you look at the question of immigration dispassionately, particularly at the economics, you discover that immigration does immense good for a country. The CBI, for example, point out that "every one per cent increase in immigration there was a corresponding 1.5 per cent increase in national wealth". The IOM have statistics showing that "migrants can bring many benefits to both the countries they move to and the ones they leave behind, according to a major new study" (BBC). This is why some nationalists are pro-immigration. They have looked at, and understood, the figures, and realised the economics show their country does best with significant immigration. Of course, they'll insist on immigrants learning about their host country, learning to appreciate the host culture, and settling in properly, etc.. That's a different issue. But it is those nationalists who remain anti-immigration who conceal the racists. Perhaps they haven't looked at this data, probably they haven't understood it, but it is the racists who hate too much to take it into account, who hate too much to allow economic fact to interfere with their vile belief. So an ex-racist who hasn't changed his views, but who has learnt to keep his mouth shut, may hide amongst anti-immigration nationalists. So now we come to the Daily Mail. It was once openly racist, but claims to have learnt its lesson. It is nationalist, and is anti-immigration. It has many staff, and is clearly quite capable of employing people who do understand economics, yet it remains anti-immigration. Thus I, and others, am very suspicious that actually it remains racist, but has simply learnt to keep its mouth shut. |
prose arts & ego dish dosh © & licence A summary of uncivil law Question to The Daily Mail St Edmundsbury Council Bureaucracy Regulate Elections Nationalism and Racism |
this archive
is hosted by
arts & ego
© 1978-2024 dylan harris