ranting poesie

This is the third volume of my (Dylan Harris's) poetry published by Potato Press. This volume is copylefted, licensed by the General Arts Licence.

This zip file contains Word 2000 and Publisher 2000 format files used in the last print run.

For those unwilling to use propriety software to reproduce copylefted material, you can gather the entire booklet from this site. The photograph used on the cover is below, followed by a copy of copyright notice, contents, and essays (material not available elsewhere on this site).

image: potato

potato press


blue wail and flashing siren
glare back at the emptiness
ranting poesie
push pop the lingo lads

image: Cover

copyright notice

Copyright © 2003 Dylan Harris.
Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this work under the terms of the General Arts Licence, Version 0.2, with back cover texts being "Originally published by Potato Press.". A copy of the Licence is included in the section entitled "General Arts Licence".


introduction        ii
why copyleft my poetry        ii
Acknowledgements        iii
an engineering rush        1
new scientist        1
a song so dire        1
the argument        1
another bitch        2
homework        2
hymnen        3
recreated arts        3
the game        3
oh gods        4
rushed off        5
unanswering        5
uncivil law        5
centuries        5
age        5
injustice        6
complexity        7
money        7
smirk        7
flame        7
magistrates        8
wrong        8
invention        8
scotland        8
criminal        9
consent        9
piano        9
parliament        9
citizen        10
bailiff        10
bones        10
health        10
maid        11
blackbox        11
fear        11
the clarion        11
lord pisswater's clarion        11
beer and pindar        12
damn the clarion        12
poetry        12
push pop        12
select        12
techno        13
what        13
copyleft        13
pah!        13
england corrupted        14
General Arts Licence        15


Welcome to "ranting poesie", one of four small potato press collections I'm preparing.

The purpose of these collections is to raise the funds for a drink in the pub after I've given a reading. If I'm really lucky, I'll may have enough left over to subscribe to a poetry magazine (but not the one that inspired "pah!").

This is apt, since the ranting poesie form is for pub philosophers. A ranting poesie poem should be simple to recite whilst drunk. It should flow easily through the mouth, without using obvious words or obvious order. It should challenge belief.

I explore different styles of ranting poesie here. The clarion hates; an engineering rush is boisterous; uncivil law dissents; poetry's an ego-trip.

Be warned: I've found the hard way I'm completely hopeless at selecting my own poetry. There are poems that I consider awful that have been published. I've gone back to dreadful poems after ten years and realised 'hang on a sec'. There are poems I consider excellent that no-one else likes. So, apart from the outrageous drivel, I've kept nothing from these collections. That's half the reason they're so cheap.

My website is dylanharris.org. You'll find versions of these poems there. But there is a fundamental advantage to buying a copy of the poems in this booklet rather than browsing online: I get a pint out of you. Thank you!

why copyleft my poetry

Copyleft is, if you like, guerilla marketing. If something is copylefted, it can be freely copied, modified and distributed, commercially or non-commercially. This freedom is governed by a licence, designed to ensure this freedom is not abused.

Copyleft does not exist to be guerilla marketing. It was created to defend principles of freedom, as the introduction to the Licence suggests, in particular freedom of thought and action against abusive restrictions by the owners of intellectual property rights and patents. What if a motor car manufacturer stated that you are not permitted to maintain your car, you have to use their highly expensive services? What if the car failed after five miles and you were barred from opening the bonnet to reconnect the battery? That's how a lot of the software industry works, and that's why the hacker's hacker (a word given negative connotations by those scared of freedom), Richard Stallman, started the Free Software Foundation. For further information, visit the FSF website at www.fsf.org, or read Sam Williams's copylefted biography of Richard Stallman, "Free As In Freedom", O'Reilly, ISBN 0-596-00287-4.

Certain reasons for copyleft do not apply to a collection of poetry. Where, in a poem, is the oil that I can charge you for changing? No, my reasons to copyleft my poetry are very different. In my collection 'Ranting Poesie' is a poem entitled, would you believe, 'Copyleft' (which can also be found on my website).

If a poetry collection is copyleft; anyone can copy and distribute it as they wish, subject to the licence. If the poetry is copied, I neither pay nor receive a penny. If a critical mass is achieved, copyleft material can conquer the world. In the computer world, the copyleft operating system Linux is global and challenging even Microsoft Windows; which is incredible when you consider it began as a hobby project of Linux Torvelds, a Finnish student. Copyleft can be very powerful.

Poetry does not make much money; even the greatest poets often need additional income. William Wordsworth was a tax collector, Ted Hughes was a farmer, and many living poets, such as Benjamin Zephaniah, lecture in poetry at universities. One does not become a poet to become rich. Poetry is rarely a source of instant success. Only certain well established poets are generally known to poetry readers. Just a few poets are known to the general population. Such general awareness usually follows years of hard poetic graft and sculpted art. Poetry is---usually---a long game.

I do have ambition; I do like people knowing about and commenting on my poetry. It's a reward for all that creative investment, if you like. I want people to hear, read and enjoy my work. That won't happen if they don't know about it.

So I need good distribution. I can't afford it myself, so I have to depend on publishers. Most poetry publishing houses are merely national, if that; all disappointingly parochial. Worse, though eminently sensible from their perspective, is that I'm an unknown uncollected poet; I would be a seriously risky investment. I'm not confident about traditional distribution.

I'm interested in the long game. I'd like to get my name and poetry known. I hope easily available modern English poetry, which can be copied, distributed, and modified, will be of interest in education. If I'm right, advanced students of English may see my work, and hopefully a few of them will like it and want more.

There are charitable reasons why copylefting poetry might be a good thing. A volume costs less to produce and distribute; there are no royalties. It becomes extremely low cost if distributed electronically. All the legal information is included in the volume, so even the most fastidious need not waste time and effort checking permissions. This makes it cheaper to put such poetry into schools and colleges, where it can assist advanced students to explore modern English literature---there's even a clause in the licence requesting copies from to be donated to schools. There are no doubt better examples of modern English poetry out there, but I believe something---even my something---is better than nothing.

I'd always intended to copyleft my work, so I had no a problem with publishing it online at my website (dylanharris.org). Even if I killed the site today, the Internet Archive Internet Archive (web.archive.org) will have copies of it, and would continue to make these copies available without successful and seriously expensive legal action. Anyone with net access can see my poetry anyway without paying me for it. Publishing a copyleft collection isn't really a change.


Apart from some poems accepted by Never Bury Poetry, these poems have not been submitted for publication.

I would like to thank Jenni Tucker and Linda Gamlin for CB1. The great Chinese poet Li Po led me to my poem 'beer and pindar'. You should not need to understand any of the references in my poem 'the engineering rush' to enjoy the work, unless I've messed up. But if you do want to explore:

  • The Simulation Argument (www.simulation-argument.com) inspired 'an engineering rush'. It is a creation of the philosopher Nick Bostrom. My sequence includes an inaccurate misinterpretation of this serious work.
  • Michio Kaku's cosmology book "Hyperspace" (Oxford University Press, 1994, 0B19B508514B0) proposes that universes evolve, and suggests some experiments to disprove the theory.
  • Most people did not experience English schooling, so they will not know that 'homework' should resonate with stories of England's King Henry VIII.
  • Aeschylus was supposedly killed when an eagle, attempting to break a tortoise by dropping it on rock, dropped it on him instead.
  • The Prince was written by the medieval political theorist Machiavelli.
  • p-brane theory suggests the universe may exist in a four dimensional membrane, which is a small part of a much larger n-dimensional structure.
  • The poem "Hymnen" is in my collection 'blue wail and flashing siren'.

The poem 'select' mentions that I've attended the premier of a piece I believed changed music. That piece was Steve Reich's "Different Trains".

Kernighan & Ritchie (mentioned in Copyleft) create the computer programming language 'C', and wrote the book. Most Operating Systems, including Windows and Linux, are written in 'C' and its descendant 'C++'.

Like The Iliad, The Mahabharata is the source poem for a great religion. Unlike The Iliad, The Mahabharata's religion (Hinduism) lives. It's a pity Hindu bigots seem to have ascendancy in India.

this archive is hosted by arts & ego
© 1978-2023 dylan harris